Saturday, March 2, 2019
Into the Wild Essay
You will surrender 45 minutes to plan and redeem an screen on the topic assigned below. Before you begin writing, larn the passage care largey and plan what you will say. Your move should be as well-organized and care affluenty written as you can make it. I approximate that Chris McCandless was b unspoiled and ignorant at the same conviction. He had no parklands sense, and he had no craft passing into Alaska with his wild-eyed silliness. He do a lot of mistakes based on arrogance. I dont extol him at tout ensemble for his courage nor his noble ideas. Really, I specify he was hardly plain worried. Shaun CallarmanExplain Callarmans argument and handle the extent to which you agree or disagree with his analysis. Support your couch, providing cerebrates and examples from your own experience, observations, or construe. The sample savant proves that follow reflect the EPT pull ahead take ins criteria for their respective strike offs. Sample student essay with a exhaust to of 6Life Not an Episode of Grizzly ManYes, living exclusively in the wilderness equivalent Thoreau and London sounds exciting, especially if you fake a big part of your adventures or if you can pack up and go home when you get to a fault hungry. Chris McCandless doesnt occupy these options, as yet Shaun Callarman call backs that Chris is entire of sentimentalist silliness, and by this statement I ideate he gist that Chris goes into Alaska seeing only the practised parts of the wilderness experience. Like Callarman, I believe that Chris has a head full of Romantic ideas and that he lacks common sense although I would not call him plain crazy. When Chris decides to map both(prenominal) part of the Alaskan wilderness thats already been mapped, he is definately demonstrate Romantic silliness. Callarman is right round this it doesnt seem very courageous to me to waste time doing work that most unrivaled else has already done I would want to spend my time doi ng roundthing more go forful. The wilderness in Alaska is being ruined with oil pipes and spills. Chris could of taken some of his noble ideas and used them to crack the area. By spending his energy for a good cause, he would not have seemed so supreme and ignorant, as Callarman states. It might have mat romantic to him to draw his own map, exclusively he was staying in a bus, so it seems pretty sink to me that somebody else had been there already. likewise, Callarman says that Chris made a lot of mistakes base on arrogance. I agree Chris does make a lot of errors. For instance, he brings the incorrect kind of gun, the wrong kind of clothes, overly many books and not enough food.What is the project of his shaftledge and his library interrogation in Alaska if hes not going to be uncoerced to take advise? So yes, Chriss mistakes maybe coming from an haughty brain. On the other hand, Chris did show some noble ideas, in stemma to what Callarman states. He tries to keep other throng from getting involved with him by not letting them get as well close. In addition, he real did kill a moose and not a carabou, as some people made fun of him for doing. Finally, he sounds a lot long out in the wilderness than most people could Chris is definately a droll mix of qualities, as Callarman argues, but now that I cogitate astir(predicate) it Chris is not really as drear as he looks. universe unseasoned (high school and college) is suppose to be the time of our lives for Romantic silliness. Arent we suppose to be idealists during this time? I would not want my plans and dreams to be called arrogant or ignorant, because theyre important to me and I want them to stupefy true. All in all, with his bad family liveness and sketchy role models like London, Chris did not do too bad. I do feel dispirited for his parents and sister and friends, but his life is a lesson for all of us to be careful but to follow our dreams as much as we can. scuttlebuttThi s essay illustrates the EPT get ahead talent scouts criteria for a score of 6. The crack response indicates that the carry throughr is very well prepared to handle college-level reading and writing. The source offers a concise and right explanation of the Callarman quotation and efficaciously addresses all aspects of the prompt. The essay demonstrates a thorough, critical sympathy of the passage, invoking Callarman both outright and in straightway, integrating quoted material smoothly, and using the Callarman quotation to go the generators response. The essay consistently and insightfully negotiates between Callarman and the source, even to the extent that the writing itself functions to substitute the authors position as the essay progresses. With a hardly a(prenominal) exceptions (see the second divide, for example) the writer uses transitions appropriately and effectively, both within and betweenparagraphs, to guide the ratifier through the essay. The writer offe rs specific, accurate, and relevant examples (the map, the insufficient clothing and food, too many books) to support the essays take downs. The writer concludes the essay by referring to London again at the end and bringing the essay full circle. The essays paragraphs get shorter toward the end as the writer possibly begins to rush, yet they are more often than not unified, focused, and well fortifyed. The writer has learned to write in the literary present deform, with only some wavering of verb tense (especially toward the end of the essay). The essay is generally free of errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics, except for kidskin slips (such(prenominal) as definately and maybe versus may be) that do not intermeddle with meaning. Sample student essay with a score of 5Into the vehement EssayShaun Callarman does not have much good to say about Chris McCandless. He believes that he, was bright and ignorant at the same time, meaning that Chris was smartness salutary smart e nough to get himself killed in Alaska. Callarman excessively believes that Chris, was undecomposed plain crazy, which I rally is taking his argument too far. I agree that Chris was foolish and made mistakes based on arrogance, but I dont think he was crazy. Chris was unsloped a bad combination of brains and stupidity. A college graduate should know enough to prepare for the wilderness. Who goes to a cold and distant place like Alaska with a backpack full of books and a bag of rice? He had enough money to debase the stuff he needed, why not spend some of his nest egg on a $5 map? His $24,000 would of bought him a lot of equiptment and food. tidy sum kept trying to buy him equiptment but each time he denied them. Is this being independent, or is it being stupid? I vote for stupid. Of course, Chris had a lot of problems that contributed to his decision to go into the wild. For example, his parents marriage was awful, and his soda pops double life must of been a huge shock. It s eems that Chris did a lot of this to spite his parents, like lieing about his identity, ignoring letters from home, and badmouthing his Mom and Dad. in that respect are lots of people like him that feel they have something to prove, so they go out and do something wreckless.Chris didnt prove anything by going to Alaska, besides that he was an idiot. If he hated his Mom and Dad so much, maybe he should of righteousgone somewhere and started a overbold life, maybe he should of taken his savings and bought a cabin in Alaska and been alone as long as he precious instead of starving to death in a bus for innocent hikers to rein later. If Chris is crazy, then so are a lot of other people, but he seems more foolish and even mean. For example, what about the way he treated the old man Ron? Ron really cared about Chris and he had already lost his entire family, but Chris tried to tell him how to live. After all that, he hit the road again and left Ron behind. This example shows that he only thinks of himself passim the book, which just makes him like many others, dumb. Callarman lets him off too easy when he calls him crazy. If Chris was crazy, he could of been helped, but I believe he was mostly foolish and angry. He went to Alaska in a contain tantrum to show everyone, but he paid the biggest price in his death. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 5. The clear competence of the essay indicates that this writer is ready to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer set excursions a reason sufficient and clear thesis that responds to the prompt. The writer opens with an accurate summary of the Callarman passage, choosing to focus on the idea of whether or not Chris is crazy to develop a well-reasoned response. The writer shows some depth and complexity by attempting to consider opposing viewpoints in the third paragraph, although the logic wavers somewhat. The essay tends to overdrive generalities (largel y that McClandless was dumb or stupid), and some sections are underdevelop. However, the writer does provide some specific examples (McClandless refusal to obtain equipment, his abandonment of Ron) to back up the essays assertions. The writers personal voice is lively and consistent throughout the essay.Transitions are occasionally awkward or missing, but the writer generally succeeds at using transitional linguistic process to guide the endorser through the essay. The writer is up to(p) to reiterate the essays position in the terminal paragraph without being overly crying. The essay suffers from some errors of expression, such as spelling (equiptment, lieing), usage (would of, should of), mechanics (his parents marriage), semicolon use, pronoun confusion (the use of he in the archetypical paragraph), and way (overuse of a lot), but these concerns do not generally take out from meaning. On the strong side,this writer has learned to use a comma butterfly before coordinating c onjunctions that connect independent clauses. Sample student essay with a score of 4Chris McCandless was a risk-taker. He was a young man that wanted to be independent and live his life without anyone telltale(a) him what to do. Some people, such as Shaun Callarman, describe him as ignorant and arrogant. Others admire him for his ability to maintain his independence and live under his own guard while maintaining his morals. Shaun Callarman says he was bright and ignorant at the same time. He had to have been bright. He read amazingly difficult books and followed their teachings as well. However, aside from calling him bright, Callarman also calls McCandless ignorant. Was McCandless ignorant for following the teachings of these books? No. He was just curious and obviously determined. Callarman states, He had no common sense, and he had no business going into Alaska with his Romantic silliness. I agree with what Callarman says in this passage. parking area sense would have told him to bring the necessary supplies with him before attempting to go into the wilderness of Alaska. I have been taught from a very young age to not go anywhere without my necessities, whether it be money, food, or water. I also have been taught to not go anywhere alone, especially if it is a huge risk. Chris McCandless ignored, or showed absolutely no common sense. I do not however think he was crazy. I do admire him for his ability to keep back his morals and live his dreams out to their fullest potency. He took risks and in doing so was able to achieve what he most wanted. Independence. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 4. This adequate response to the topic enkindles that the writer should be able to handle college-level reading and writing. The writer demonstrates a generally accurate understanding of the passage, although the writer struggles to understand some of Callarmans points (i.e., how McCandless could be bright and ignorant at the same time). The essay delivers its thesis in the low gear sentence this thesis is succinct and responds to the prompt. The outgrowth paragraph is brief but adequately set up, with the question, Was Chris independent or arrogant? posed through logic and transitional language (e.g., Some people . . . in the third sentence,followed by Others . . . in the fourth). The writer quotes Callarman both instanter and indirectly and attempts to incorporate quoted material smoothly with tag phrases, introductions, and other markers, although the quotations later on the first paragraph are repetitive in terms of coordinate and logic. The essay as a whole is somewhat simplistic and repetitive.The final paragraph, for example, fundamentalally restates the thesis paragraph (first paragraph), and the body paragraphs tend to repeat their points as well. The logic in the essay is uneven, particularly in the third paragraph, where the essay seems to argue against its own thesis when the wri ter attempts to acknowledge Callarmans Romantic silliness comment. The writer offers transitional language, although somewhat simplistic, within paragraphs (however is a prominent transition) but does not provide similar guidance for the endorser between paragraphs. The examples from the textual matter (reading hard books, leaving without necessities) are relevant but are general and underdeveloped. The essay generally demonstrates control of grammar, usage, and mechanics in fact, this essay is a prime example of a paper that handles the side of meat language quite competently but that struggles in other areas, such as organization and development. Sample student essay with a score of 3Chris McCandless was an adventourous man. Chris McCandless wanted to live his life to the fullest. Chris had changed his found to Alex the Supertramp. Alex wanted to live on the road. So he packed up all his belongings and burned his money. He unfortunaly died hundred and twelve days afterward he hit the road. Many people think of him as inspiration. While Others belived he was Crazy. I personally believe that Alex was an inspiration. An man by the name of Shawn Callarman had written a passage about Alex. Callarman writes I think that Chris McCandless was bright and ignorant. Callarman goes on to say that I think he was just plain Crazy. I disagree I believe Alex had a purpose in life. I believe that Alex had taken some time to think about his journey. Alex had a purpose in his life. I believe he wanted to show people how they can have goals and still acheive them. til now though he died on his Journey he left a track behind. Alex had many pals along the way and he made a difference in their lives. Chris McCandless was an inspiration to me. Many people have their opinions of Chris. Chriss story could leantowards both ways. I believe that Chris MaCandless made a difference in a least one persons life on his Journey. Chris McCandless was Crazy but he was not just a regular m an. Chris McCandless was an inspiration to us all. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 3 however, it is a worn 3. Although the essay suggests developing competence, it is flawed in significant ways that suggest the writer needs additional practice before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. The writer makes limited use of the passage, instruction solely on the idea of McClandlesss potential craziness. The essay quotes Callarman by implication and without attribution in the final sentence of the first paragraph. It mentions Callarman directly only in the second paragraph by providing 2 quotations, the first of which is simply dropped in, then left unaddressed. The writer struggles to choose between two potential thesis statements (I personally believe that Alex was an inspiration and I believe Alex had a purpose in life), both contained in the second paragraph and reiterated but not supported elsewhere in the essay . The body paragraphs are a series of assertions that lack effective transitions.The writer has limited control of syntax and vocabulary, using a highly repetitive sentence structure throughout the essay, with constructions of similar length, grammatical structure, and simplicity (e.g., the first three sentences of the first paragraph open with the word Chris). The writer offers examples from the text that are accurate (McClandlesss changing his name, burning the money, making friends along the way), but these examples are often unspecific and are generally underdeveloped and undersupported. The writer struggles to maintain a consistent and appropriate verb tense throughout the essay. The essay suffers from an accumulation of errors, especially errors in spelling (unfortuanly and belived), punctuation (missing commas and misuse single quotation marks), and erratic capitalization (Others and Crazy). Sample student essay with a score of 2Into the Wild EssayCallarmans argument is that he thinks that McCandless was bright but a the same time ignorant. He tries to said that he was dum by saying he wasignorant. Also he try to said that McCandless didnt have no business to go to Alaska. That he made Mistakes based on Pride. That he was just going there because he was Crazy he didnt know why he was going there. I also agree with him because why he wanted to go to Alaska. Specialy when he didnt have the right things to live in a place like that. He also was acting crazy that he didnt even know what he was doing. He even die because he didnt have no Food to eat. And he was acting weird with his parents and his brother and sister. Callamar made a good opinion about McCandless by saying that because he didnt act like a normal person. I think he didnt act like an adult. Specialy when he sent the Letters to his Family and his Friends. I think he did Miss his people he didnt wanted to assume he Miss them. He should to stay with his parents and never went to Alaska. McCandle ss did it wrong because he went to Alaska just because of his Romantic illness. That was not a good reason to just go away and live to another place were he would not live in good conditions. I think he could Forget about his Romantic illness and he could even get another person. But he even kill his own life which is not a good thing. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 2. The serious flaws here indicate that this writer will need considerable additional practice before being able to succeed in college-level reading and writing. This piece provides a good picture of a student whose ESL writing features are profoundly obscuring what would differently be a stronger (that is, a 3-level) essay. The writer demonstrates a basic understanding of the passage but focuses on repeating Callarmans points without establishing a clear direction for the essay. The writer fails to respond to the prompt with a focused thesis. The first sentence of the s econd paragraph, I also agree with him . . . alludes to a potential thesis that has not yet been offered and that never appears explicitly in the essay. Although the writer attempts four body paragraphs, the paragraphs are not logically linked to one another. The writer attempts in the second paragraph to use transitional language to guide the reader through that particular paragraph, but the essays organization both within and between paragraphs is left largely to the reader to discern.The essay offers generalizations (he was acting weird with his parents) without providing specific support. The writerlacks basic control of syntax (see the first sentence of the third paragraph) and vocabulary (Romantic illness), and some statements make no logical or syntactic sense at all (see the third sentence of the second paragraph and the first sentence of the third paragraph). The writer has serious and persistent errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics (spelling, erratic capitalization) t hat severely inject with meaning. The problems many English learners have with idioms (because why he wanted to go), verb tenses (he tries to said), and verb forms (he even kill his own life) are pervasive and profoundly obscure meaning. Sample student essay with a score of 1I sure do agree with Callarmans argument. She is absolutly right McCandless was bright and ignorant. And He defenatly had no common sense, he was one of those weird people you wont expect. For my observation she gots the same thoughts as I do. I shure think defining terms allows me to cushion my position. The evidence that I will use is that He was writing all his up and down pants. In my point of view I think that McCnadless was avery unique guy. He even did things that no one would do. An example, work everywhere he stop use his name and give out half of his idenity. That is my point and answere for this paragraph. CommentaryThis essay illustrates the EPT Scoring Guides criteria for a score of 1. The fundamen tal deficiencies of this essay distinctly indicate that the writer needs much additional practice in order to be ready to succeed at college-level reading and writing. The writer agrees with the Callarman quotation without demonstrating any understanding of the passage. The writer fails to use the Callarman passage to develop a meaningful response to the prompt. The essay, at approximately 120 words, is soberly underdeveloped statements of agreement with Callarman make up a considerable draw of the text. The digression about cushioning my position contributes nothing to the minimal text the writer provides. The writers reflective statements about purpose are withal wasted. The only evidence provided by the writer is McCandlesss evasive military posture toward self-identification at work, but even this example is so poorly uttered as to be nearly incoherent. The writer lacks basic control of syntax and vocabulary.The writer has serious and persistent errors in mechanics that sev erely interfere with meaning. Spelling and verb form errors are pervasive.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment